5 May 2016
Donald Trump has vanquished his rivals and Hillary Clinton seems set for the nomination. Political scientist Simon Jackman talks to Peter Clarke about what happens next
The polariser: sign in a suburban street in Upper Arlington, Ohio. dankeck/Flickr
Ted Cruz has gone; Bernie Sanders’s numbers still don’t add up… it looks like Clinton vs Trump in November. Political scientist Simon Jackman talks to Inside Story podcast editor Peter Clarke about how the contest is likely to unfold and what it means for Congress and the post-2016 political scene.
• Inside Story published before August 2016 are now archived in iTunes – just click here and scroll down the list of titles in reverse chronological order.
National Affairs
12 December 2018
Counting is nearly over and the post-poll landscape has become clear. But is Canberra listening?
Correspondents
11 December 2018
Britain’s economic model has to change, and that may take another seizure
National Affairs
11 December 2018
The Coalition wants to introduce compulsory voter ID in Australia. Here’s why we don’t need it
National Affairs
10 December 2018
If judges don’t have a clear idea of how police should behave, where does that leave everyone else?
4 May 2016
We don’t know for certain why people vote the way they do, writes Paul Rodan. But three theories give us glimpses
Right:
What are they thinking? Xavier Smythe waits as his father Tony votes at Bondi Beach on 7 September 2013. Rick Rycroft/AP Photo
What are they thinking? Xavier Smythe waits as his father Tony votes at Bondi Beach on 7 September 2013. Rick Rycroft/AP Photo
